The Rain Review of Books
Box 2684 Station Terminal, Vancouver, Coast Salish Territory BC/CA V6B
3W8 | 604-682-3269 ext 7326 | books@rainreview.net
Remembering Resistance: A Review of Silvia Federici, Caliban and
the Witch: Women, the Body and
Primitive Accumulation (New York: Autonomedia, 2004)
By Fiona Jeffries
The Rain 4:1 (Winter 2006): 3
“Whatever their weaknesses,” wrote Protestant leader Martin Luther in
the mid-sixteenth century amidst the European Witch-Hunts, “women
possess one virtue that cancels them all: they have a womb and they can
give birth.” Luther’s comments were far from shocking at the time.
Rather they echoed a powerful current of thought that linked population
growth to national wealth. So argues Silvia Federici in her impressive
book Caliban and the Witch: Women,
the Body and Primitive Accumulation, that this connection
between church and the state power and the production of labour power
in early capitalism launched the Witch-Hunts that peaked in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in Europe and the Americas.
Federici’s book is a crucial contribution to the long history of
resistance to the violence of the global capitalist enclosures. The
long-time anti-empire, feminist activist and scholar situates the
Witch-Hunts within a history of five centuries of capitalist
globalization. The Witch-Hunts, her book argues, were as foundational
to the production of the modern proletariat and global capitalism as
the expropriation of the European peasantry, the genocidal campaigns of
colonization in the Americas and the African slave trade. Caliban
presents a sprawling global
history, not of nations but of a collection of places connected through
an historical web of exploitation and resistance. Caliban, the
anti-colonial rebel from Shakespeare’s The Tempest, she
explains, is a
symbol of the world proletariat and proletarian body as a site of
resistance to capitalism. The figure of the witch at the centre of this
story is an embodiment of a world that had to be destroyed for
capitalism to flourish. The book sets out to answer several core
questions: What fears prompted this concerted policy of genocide? Why
was such savage violence asserted? And why were women its principal
targets?
The charges laid against persecuted women in Europe and in the Americas
were so outrageous, Federici contends, that they were incommensurable
with any crime. The violence is not accountable by conventional
analyses of greed, she argues, since the majority of the women killed
were very poor. While the Inquisitors documented their violence with
intricate, sadistic detail, we are missing the viewpoint of the victim.
Drawing on the rich archives of the radical “history from below”
perspective, which privileges the voices of ordinary people and the
hidden histories of resistance that have always dogged the dreams of
the powerful, Federici’s book traces change through social struggle.
Capitalism, she shows, is not the pre-ordained march of history that
its early and contemporary ideologues, and often its Marxist
adversaries, suggest. Rather, early modern Witch-Hunting capitalism,
like its contemporary “War on Terror” variant, was a
counter-revolutionary movement to halt the surge of anti-Feudal revolts
and women-led heretical movements sweeping medieval Europe.
“Capitalism,” she argues, “was the counter-revolution that destroyed
the possibilities that had emerged from the anti-feudal
struggle—possibilities which, if realized, might have spared us the
immense destruction of lives and the natural environment that had
marked the advance of capitalist relations worldwide” (21-22).
Emphasizing a methodology of material effects in opposition to
revisionist history devoted to speculating on the intentions of the
powerful, Federici sets out to demonstrate the extent to which the
early modern Witch-Hunts constituted a war on women that was grounded
in two foundations of capitalism. First, that capitalism was imposed
through an unprecedented drive to harness and accumulate labour power,
a system based on the necessarily relentless expansion of workforce and
intensification of exploitation. The Witch-Hunt actualized capital’s
strategic reliance on controlling women’s bodies, sexuality and
reproductive power and the articulation of this violence through
accusing women of making men impotent, of infanticide and criminalizing
contraception and calling it demonic. It separated women from control
over their reproduction and turned the female body into a technology of
reproducing the labour force.
The enclosures of the common lands in early modern Europe during these
centuries have been considered a seminal period marking the
“transition” from feudalism to capitalism and Federici’s history both
draws on and critiques this perspective. The second foundation of her
hidden history draws on the theoretical work associated with autonomous
Marxism’s re-thinking of the place of so-called “primitive
accumulation” in capitalism. Here, Federici complicates the Marxian
lexicon of primitive accumulation, a description of the processes of
capitalist transformation that appropriate both land and body, turning
people into machines and land into property. She, like the authors such
as Massimo De Angelis and others associated with the Commoner
journal, emphasize the unbroken character of primitive accumulation and
argue it is not set in the historical moment of the “transition” from
feudalism to capitalism but rather is defined by an ongoing process of
separation of people from access to independent sources of livelihood.
To abolish the commons it was necessary to break solidarities between
women and men. Primitive accumulation, she argues, was not only an
accumulation of capital and exploitable workers but “also an
accumulation of differences and divisions within the working class”
(63).
The Witch-Hunt, she argues, is a story of terror exacted to enclose not
only land but social relations and to turn the body into a
work-machine. Turning the body into a factory required both violence
and terror and the theoretical scaffolding of state theorists such as
French jurist and demonologist Jean Bodin who authored a “handbook” for
the Witch trials: “We must spread terror among some by punishing many,”
he advised. Terror was essential to enclose the body, the land and
social relations by force before these relations appeared normal to the
multitudes of ordinary people losing their livelihood: “The witch-hunt
grew in a social environment where the ‘better sorts’ were living in
constant fear of the ‘lower classes’, who could certainly be expected
to harbor evil thoughts because in this period they were losing
everything they had” (173).
Caliban explores the role of
the Witch-Hunts in the imposition of a separation of production for the
market and production of human beings. Federici shows how the mass
killings of women served the purpose of at once devaluing reproductive
labour and imbuing production for the market with economic value,
meanwhile making women the main subject of reproductive work. This
division created another, crucial, separation, inaugurating a new
sexual division of labour that drove a wedge of differentiation between
male and female labour and hence men and women. In some sixteenth
century European towns, women were forbidden to work for a wage and
women’s reproductive work was subordinated to men’s productive work,
effectively condemning women to unpaid work and dependence on men for
their survival. She demonstrates this through examples of how in
witch-hunt ideology women associated with making money were accused of
making a pact with the devil. This process was central to normalizing
the separation between productive and reproductive labour, a
distinction unique to modern capitalism. Upon women’s unpaid labour was
built a new patriarchal domination, what she calls the “patriarchy of
the wage”.
Caliban is influenced by two
connected movements: autonomous feminism and resistance to the new
enclosures, also known as neoliberal globalization. Her feminist
history challenges the conventions of “women’s history” as somehow
separate from the history men live in. It also takes on Marxian
historiography, arguing that it fails to recognize the specificity of
women’s exploitation and resistance, evidenced by the fact that this
history has barely acknowledged the Witch-Hunts as integral to the
much-theorized “transition” from feudalism to capitalism. The murders
of hundreds of thousands of women in the name of crushing the presence
of the devil in the bodies of the communities undergoing enclosure was,
she argues, happening in tandem with the expropriation of people from
the land, the colonization of the Americas, the waves of “bloody laws”
against the vagabonds and the launching of the trans-Atlantic slave
trade. It was while teaching in Nigeria in the 1980s when the country
was subjected to World Bank/International Monetary Fund “structural
adjustment programs” that Federici witnessed the continuity of this
history in action. The experience suggested a resurgence of a new round
of enclosures not laying waste to communities through the robed figure
of the sadist Inquisitor, but armies in suits on IMF/WB expense
accounts. These agents, dispatched to preside over a new phase of
“primitive accumulation”, wield briefcases full of statutes governing
the privatization of land and the incorporation of labour into the
24-hour global casino. Since then, Federici has combined her ongoing
activities as coordinator of the Committee for Academic Freedom in
Africa with rich critical analyses of contemporary African struggles in
her collections Enduring Western
Civilization (1995), African
Visions (2000), and A
Thousand Flowers (2000), and through her work with the Midnight Notes collective.
Hence Federici’s charged historical critique aims to read the past in
the present to elaborate an understanding of exploitation and
resistance to global capitalism that challenges the conventional
historiography of not only the long-line of state theorists who treat
the rise of capitalism as a natural evolutionary process. She also
challenges a line within the Marxist tradition, which has either
ignored or relegated the significance of the Witch-Hunts to a minor
event in this history. While Marx’s observation that capital comes into
the world “dripping from head to toe from every pore, with blood and
dirt” the Witch-Hunts, Federici argues, have been overlooked by Marxist
historians who treated it as irrelevant in the history of class
struggle. But the relation between the femicide of the sixteenth and
seventeeth centuries and the production of labouring bodies so central
to capitalist development is what Federici so provocatively explores in
this book. Here she concurs with Mary Daly’s 1978 observation that much
history of witch hunts is written from a “woman-executing viewpoint”.
US Sociologist Steve Colatrella calls Caliban
the most important book on the origins of capitalism since Emmanuel
Wallerstein’s The Modern World System,
published thirty years ago. Indeed, one of the most compelling aspects
of this fascinating history is its contemporary resonance. The
Witch-Hunts, Federici argues, are analogous to today’s “War on Terror”.
“The very vagueness of the charge—the fact that it was impossible to
prove it, while at the same time it evoked the maximum of horror—meant
that it could be used to punish any form of protest and to generate
suspicion even towards the most ordinary aspects of daily life” (170).
Federici’s book shows us how the terror of the Witch-Hunts was designed
to break solidarities and impose consent by the force of fear to
establish a new world of violent hierarchy. In documenting how much
hard work and what resources it takes to make these hierarchies seem
natural and fixed, Caliban
demonstrates how contested and even fragile they continue to be.